It was a made-for-TV split screen of the generational geography in Massachusetts’ Eighth District congressional primary.
In a single day, 71-year-old Representative Stephen Lynch talked Trump cuts and term limits with seniors at Braintree’s Elder Affairs, while later in Boston, his 39-year-old Democratic challenger, Patrick Roath, barreled down the perilous ‘Cop Slide’ on City Hall Plaza alongside a firebrand Gen Z gun violence activist.
The age and style differences between the two candidates underscore a key dynamic animating the Democratic Party, even in safe-blue corners such as Massachusetts: Whether a tested old-guard or a youthful but inexperienced vanguard is best to meet the moment, both in terms of the party’s own struggles to connect with voters, and in confronting the Republican opposition.
Lynch is pitching that his 25 years in the House and seniority on committees position him to deliver for his district and respond to a Trump-led White House.
Roath, meanwhile, is singling out aspects of Lynch’s moderate record to argue that a fresh perspective is urgently needed to fight the Trump administration.
“It’s not that Congressman Lynch is too old, or he’s bad, or he’s corrupt — it’s just that the times demand something different,” Roath said.
Such calls for generational change aren’t anything new, nor is the 8th Congressional contest the only one in Massachusetts where the age question is so present. But this race may be the one that puts the choice in the starkest terms for voters.
Read the article here.